CO129-338 - Public Offices & Others - 1906 — Page 709

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

Cox (ant502/01) suggests that box,

f hind really meant this, he and have used some words to show that he did that, as a knew "enough of the way to act as defence: the whole are he policeman Law & practice noto Holt did of conducted it he had a he Equally poised against the ware 703 Other men yet they were punished. If I submit that be ought to be treated whe R Chen valid I submit however, that the man's conduct with the manner in which he has acted shows that he is a very difficult and very stupid person, and probably didn't really understand what he was doing. Moreover, it was obvious that but may prejudicing from the (See Sir E. Wingfield's minute 9720/987 on 97 Be my mate Dr. his manner no doubtless frightened box for Holt for merely legal he did not know what he was (his may's best friends could not during say that his manner is calculated to put a man at his ease.).

I think it very possible that guilty, just Hall was as it is very possible that Quincy & Stanton were guilty. I submit however, that there is no evidence that he was guilty of anything the an incompetence & neglect of duty. Incompetence & neglect. I would like to put the case to Sir Edward and ask him to take a lenient view and let the vote be a reduced pension, if they think fit.

I feel him that they ought not to accept his suggesting that it may in reporting все on his case will refer the present former. Mnr Cou R.E.L. 24/10 W Grassed i 1903, malles I take a different view of this case. Briefly, the facts are as follows:- Cult In 1891 the Hong Kong Court made grave illegality. The result was that in 1897 there was a great scandal, and large part of the police force was involved in accusations of receiving bribes from illicit gambling houses. See Mr. Meachen's minute on Gov/20058/97 for an account of the matter.

Mr. May (now Col. Sec., then head of the police) held an enquiry and collected evidence. One European Inspector was prosecuted and sentenced to imprisonment. Others were brought before the Ex. Govt. and retired on pension. European and Asiatic other members of the force - both were dismissed under the provisions of a local Police Ordinance.

Edit History

2026-06-03 12:09:06 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
Cox (ant502/01) suggests that box, f hind really meant this, he and have used some words to show that he did that, as a knew "enough of the way to act as defence: the whole are he policeman Law & practice noto Holt did of conducted it he had a he Equally poised against the ware 703 Other men yet they were punished. If I submit that be ought to be treated whe R Chen valid I submit however, that the man's conduct with the manner in which he has acted shows that he is a very difficult and very stupid person, and probably didn't really understand what he was doing. Moreover, it was obvious that but may prejudicing from the (See Sir E. Wingfield's minute 9720/987 on 97 Be my mate Dr. his manner no doubtless frightened box for Holt for merely legal he did not know what he was (his may's best friends could not during say that his manner is calculated to put a man at his ease.). I think it very possible that guilty, just Hall was as it is very possible that Quincy & Stanton were guilty. I submit however, that there is no evidence that he was guilty of anything the an incompetence & neglect of duty. Incompetence & neglect. I would like to put the case to Sir Edward and ask him to take a lenient view and let the vote be a reduced pension, if they think fit. I feel him that they ought not to accept his suggesting that it may in reporting все on his case will refer the present former. Mnr Cou R.E.L. 24/10 W Grassed i 1903, malles I take a different view of this case. Briefly, the facts are as follows:- Cult In 1891 the Hong Kong Court made grave illegality. The result was that in 1897 there was a great scandal, and large part of the police force was involved in accusations of receiving bribes from illicit gambling houses. See Mr. Meachen's minute on Gov/20058/97 for an account of the matter. Mr. May (now Col. Sec., then head of the police) held an enquiry and collected evidence. One European Inspector was prosecuted and sentenced to imprisonment. Others were brought before the Ex. Govt. and retired on pension. European and Asiatic other members of the force - both were dismissed under the provisions of a local Police Ordinance.
Baseline (Original)
Cox (ant502(on) suggest that box, f hind really meant this, he and have used some words to shew that he did that, as a Knew "mough of thuy to act as defence: the whole Are he policeman Law & practice noto Holt didi of conducted it g he had a he Equally poszed against the ware 703 Other men yet they whe peusined. If submit that be angat to the treated whe R Chen valid I submit havover, that the man's corrce with manner in which he has Ill. ader contad shers that he is a very dikata very stupid person. & portably didn't really understand what he เร doing. Moreover, it was obvias that but may W prejuding from the (SH-Sir bogūning (See Sir E. Wingfield's munte 9720/987 on 97 Be my mate Dr. his manner po doubtless frightened box fur Holk fo merila téral he did not know what he was (hir may's best friends could not Joring say that his maier is calentated tipuli a man at his case.). I think it very possible that guilley, just Hall was as it is vory possible that Quincy & Stanton whe guilty. I submit: havover, that there shear that he mne I no ev é din u guilty of anything the an incompetence & reflect of duty. Incompetence & neglect. I would to put the Camil & ask Sir tu kathan to the Lex Leg n let the vote kün a reduced pension, if they think fil. I fell him that the ough the sofs; camot accept his suggesting that hit may in reporting все on his case will refer the present foramor. Mnr Cou R.E.L. 24/10 W Grassed i 1903, malles I tane a different iw of this calo. briefly, the facts are as follows:- Cult In 1631 the BongKong Cort. made gaveling ille el. The resuit was that in 1897 there WAS e praat scandal, and large art of the police force as involved DA in accusations of recwi in brives from illicit Campling houses. .Sue Mr. Monachten's minute on Gov/20058/97 for an account of the matter. ar. May (now Col. Sec., then he of th- polie: ) held an enquiry and collected evidence. Onu Europa? Inspector was prosecuted and sentenced to imrizon- inent. Others were brought oulera the Ex. Goil. ard retired on neision. European and Asiatic Otuer sembers of the force - both Fere dismissed under the pro- visions of a local Police Ordinance. au
2026-06-03 12:09:06 · Baseline
View content

Cox (ant502(on) suggest that box,

f

hind really meant this, he and have used some words to shew that he

did

• that, as a

Knew "mough of

thuy

to act as

defence:

the whole

Are

he

policeman Law & practice noto

Holt didi of

conducted it

g

he had

a

he

Equally poszed against

the

ware

703

Other men

yet they whe

peusined.

If submit that be angat to the treated

whe

R

Chen

valid

I submit havover, that

the man's corrce with

manner in which he has

Ill. ader contad

shers that he is a

very dikata

very stupid person.

& portably didn't really understand what

he

เร

doing. Moreover, it was obvias

that but may

W

prejuding from the

(SH-Sir bogūning (See Sir E. Wingfield's munte

9720/987

on

97

Be my mate

Dr.

his manner po doubtless

frightened box fur Holk

fo merila téral

he did not know what he was

(hir may's best friends could not

Joring

say

that his maier is calentated tipuli a man at his case.).

I think it very possible that

guilley, just

Hall was

as it is

vory possible that Quincy & Stanton whe guilty. I submit: havover, that there

shear that he

mne

I no ev é din u

guilty of anything

the an incompetence & reflect

of duty. Incompetence & neglect.

I would

to put the

Camil &

ask Sir tu kathan

to the Lex Leg n

let the vote kün a

reduced pension, if they think

fil.

I fell him that the ough

the sofs; camot accept his

suggesting that hit may

in reporting

все

on

his case

will refer the present foramor.

Mnr Cou

R.E.L.

24/10

W

Grassed

i 1903,

malles

I tane a different iw of this calo.

briefly, the facts are as follows:-

Cult

In 1631 the BongKong Cort. made gaveling ille el. The resuit was that in 1897 there WAS e praat scandal,

and large art of the police force as involved

DA

in accusations of recwi in brives from illicit

Campling houses. .Sue Mr. Monachten's minute on Gov/20058/97 for an account of the matter.

ar. May (now Col. Sec., then he of th- polie: ) held an enquiry and collected evidence. Onu Europa?

Inspector was prosecuted and sentenced to imrizon-

inent. Others were brought oulera the Ex. Goil. ard

retired on neision.

European and Asiatic

Otuer sembers of the force - both

Fere dismissed under the pro-

visions of a local Police Ordinance.

au

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.